Monday, November 7, 2011

A mental midget's ramblings.

"We need to deal with the banks, we need to deal with home foreclosures, and we need to deal with wealth disparity."
…………………………….Occupy Atlanta organizer Latron Price, November 6 2011

OK. Let’s do it then…lets deal with these issues.

1.      We need to deal with the banks.

What exactly do you want to do with them? Do you want them to provide their services for free?  Do you want them to lend money at zero interest to people who have no intention of repaying the loans? What is it exactly that you want the banks to do?

2.      We need to deal with home foreclosures.

It seems to me that anybody who borrowed money to buy a home, and then reneged on that contract by not making the payments, is not entitled to the home. So what, sir, do you want to deal with? Do you want people who are not making their payments to keep their homes? My sympathy is with those who for many reasons can no longer afford to keep their homes….but that is the key. They can no longer afford to keep them. There is NOTHING to deal with…foreclosures are going to happen, in good economic times and bad. There are always going to be people who bought more house than they can afford, people who could afford the house they bought but then lost their jobs and could no longer afford it, and people who simply never planned to make their payments and just got a place to live in for a few months.

I presume you want the banks to just let these people have the homes they are NOT paying for?

3.      We need to deal with wealth disparity.

Why?

Why is it wrong for one person to own more, have more or earn more than another person? What is it that you are trying to deal with here?

Three significant claims of the OWS idiots…and not one can be substantiated.

Not one.

Not only do these idiots not explain what it is they want to deal with, they cannot even articulate an argument for their positions.

The best they can do is some stupid bleating about fairness and Wall Street screwing them.

Well…I am going to show you exactly why the world NEEDS the 1%.

Let me introduce you to Peter Panda. Peter was just a B student struggling through his first year at college when he discovered a way to transmit ones thoughts direct to a friend’s smart phone without need for a keyboard or any transmission device. All that was needed was a smart phone and a simple app download and he could messages to anyone who wanted them just by thinking it.

He took this invention to a VC firm in the hopes that they would fund its development. His passion for his invention and the cleverly written business plan were intriguing enough to the VC that he invested $10 million on the spot. (Now, the VC has obtained that $10 million cash from investors made up largely of pension funds and a couple of wealthy entrepreneurs who had already made many millions of dollars and were looking to support a new business idea.)

Peter Panda took that money and employed a couple of business people to start building a sales channel, and a whole lot of technical types (programmers, engineers etc) – 17 to be exact – who would build the application for download.

As word got out about Peter’s new invention, pandamonium broke out and people were literally falling over themselves to buy this application.

In just a few years, Peter Panda had made several hundred million dollars when he IPO’s his company.

The VC investors were very happy…they received back in excess of $200 million which was split between them and their investors. Meanwhile, Peter was sitting on a cash hoard of $300 million!!

His Company was still selling Pandamonium products, and earning money hand over fist. He employed several thousand programmers now and they all had jobs because of his initial idea.

But what was he going to do with the $300 million in cash? Not knowing what to do he decided to just leave it in the bank, earning a lousy .5% interest per year. Of course the tax man was going to want a big chunk of that….in fact close to $100 million was set aside to send to Uncle Sam, leaving him with $200 million to call his own. But in the meantime, all $300 million was in the bank.

The bank manager was rubbing his hands together in glee. He took Peter’s $300 million and lent it out to three people:-
1.      A building contractor who was building a low rent housing project for low income residents. The cost of this enterprise was $100 million. He employed a total of 3000 people building this complex which eventually went on to house some 286 families in brand new efficiency apartments that they could afford. He sold the apartments to an investor group 3 years later for a total of $150 million, paying the bank $130 million for the loan (including interest at 10% per annum), and made a profit of $20 million which he put in the bank while looking for the next project.


2.       A small aerospace company was ready to expand its manufacturing operations and borrowed $100 million to build new premises and fit it out with the latest technology. The company was able to add over 700 jobs as a resulted of its expanded production facilities. The high technology equipment financed by the bank allowed it to reduce costs and become even more competitive in the marketplace, getting even more work. As a result, the company grew faster than expected and soon had to put on a second and then a third shift simply to keep up with demand. Within 3 years of getting the loan, the company was now employing over 2,000 people who would not otherwise have had work.

3.      $100 million was set aside for local community projects. The bank encouraged small entrepreneurs to start their own businesses, to expand existing business. They provided loans of up to $250,000 for solid businesses with solid plans and good history for expansion. These loans were at interest rates of 10 -12% and amortized over ten years. Nearly 500 local small businesses were able to take advantage of these loans, and as a result were able to create over 1000 new jobs.

It came time for Peter Panda to pay his tax bill of $90 million, so he simply wrote a check knowing that the bank would have the money. HE didn’t know what the bank had done with his money….like most people he was a little unsure of how the whole finance industry worked. He assumed that the bank had big vaults full of cash….he had no idea that by just leaving his money in the bank he could have facilitated the creation of over 6,000 jobs, and provided housing for 286 families! And this doesn’t count the several thousand people employed by Pandamonium Inc!

A couple of years later, Peter decided that he really needed to help a new entrepreneur get the start he got so he invested a few million with the VC that gave Peter his start. A few days later, that VC was approached by Hector Gonzales who had invented a device that could sense motion over vast distances and photograph whatever was moving. He saw the market in space applications, but the VC new their were some potential military applications. Hector was given $20 million to develop his idea, and it was soon acquired by the military for an unknown sum, but enough to make Hector and the VC very wealthy. Hector put his hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank….and the story starts all over again.

Peter and Hector are clearly in the 1%...and these are the people you want to take from?

The bank clearly helped a lot of people get jobs…and these are the institutions you want to tear down?

Wall Street was behind the initial investments in Peter’s and Hectors businesses…and these are the institutions you blame for the state of our economy?

Oh…I forgot to talk about Latron Price…I know nothing about this guy but I suspect that he is a bright student who struggled through a couple of years of college with a 3.0GPA and a penchant for drugs and long drawn out philosophical discussions in the early hours. He heard about this Occupy Wall Street thing…and knew that it had to be the answer to all the economic crisis the world was facing. If only the movement could deal with the banks and the foreclosures and the wealth disparity….if only all this injustice would just go away…then the world would be a better place.

Listen up Latron…if that happened, Peter would never have created Pandamonium Inc…and over 8,000 jobs would never have been created. Hector Gonzales would never have started his company and created who knows how many jobs. The cycle of economic growth, invention and increasing the standard of living for everybody would never have happened.

In fact, Latron, if you succeed with your movement, there will be NO jobs, no capital and no future. You wouldn’t even have a tent to sleep in, or a pipe to smoke your drug of choice.

On a secondary note….how many jobs do you think Latron created? He may have kept his dealer in a few bucks for a while, but that is about it.

Yep, I am gonna listen to you Latron…your need to deal with these institutions is clearly the ramblings of an undereducated, drug addled mental midget.

Stupid is as stupid says.

…..devereaux

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

It aint easy being green.....

It aint easy being green…..

I am quite sure that the Kermit in the White House spends many hours contemplating his navel and bemoaning this fact.

After all…everything green that he has touched has turned to crap of one sort or another.

Solyndra is just one of many companies supported by the green program that has resulted in dismal failure and the loss of around half a billion taxpayer dollars. I assure you, it will not be the last.

And so today we get some totally unexpected news that highlights the huge success that was the Obama green jobs program. A huge success. The $500 million set aside as part of the 2009 stimulus program for the creation of green jobs has been a roaring success. So far, 26,000 people have been trained for green jobs, and a massive 8,000 have landed green jobs.

I am being a little disingenuous here, because it turns out that only about 1/3rd of the funding has actually been spent (about $163 million) ….so if my math is correct, when the rest is spent there may be another 16, 000 jobs landed? Maybe.

Here’s the problem. Or rather several problems:-

1.      If jobs are so essential that Obama has to try to rush his latest jobs bill through Congress, or find ways around Congress to achieve his ends….why is it that jobs directed stimulus money has not been spent since 2009? Surely, he could advance job creation by speeding up the spending already approved?

2.      If green industry is the path for the future, why is it that only 8,000 jobs have been created in the last 2 years?
 
Something stinks here, and Kermit knows it!

What has actually happened is that the 2009 stimulus money was not in fact really a jobs stimulus, but was just another attempt by Kermit to force an industry that is not yet ready to even consider being prime-time, into direct competition with the big players on a world stage, without any inkling of how it can meet the price points that make it competitive.

Kermit has decided that the future for American industry is totally aligned with green technology and has chosen to redistribute your tax money to an industry that cannot survive on its own merits. Actually, it doesn’t seem able to survive on any merits, including the government attempting to pick winners and losers.

Now, I am not saying that green technologies shouldn’t be explored, shouldn’t be developed and shouldn’t be commercialized. In fact, I believe that they should be…I believe there is opportunity for great economic and ecological savings by pursuing these technologies.

What I AM saying is that government should NOT be funding that. I have no problem with DARPA and other military and quasi-military organizations funding development of specific projects at their discretion, but I do have a problem with the government (Kermit-in-Chief) determining that your tax money should be spent supporting entire industries or even certain favored companies within those industries…especially when such support is clearly by direction of the fool in the White House.

And here’s another thing…the much vaunted electric cars and hybrids that so many people are wanting are a good example of transferring pollution from the end user to the energy producer. When my gas burning car coughs and sneezes, plumes of smoke blow into the air where I am driving. The inefficiencies of my cars engine are felt at the gas pump every time I refill and the air I pollute is the same air I breathe.

I have a friend who drives a Nissan Leaf.  His clean electric engine does not puff clouds of smoke into the air where he drives. He fills it up by plugging into the wall in his garage and doesn’t see the cost (until he gets his power bill). He also doesn’t see the clouds of smoke that are released into the air at the power plant that produces the energy that comes from his plug in the wall. He doesn’t know when that plant is inefficient, coughing and sneezing pollutants into the air hundreds, maybe even thousands of miles away from where he drives.

On a side note....it is clear that hybrid and electric car sales are in the doldrums...which goes to show that even a titan like Nissan cannot turn over a new Leaf!)

Green cars simply move the problem of burning fossil fuels from the car driver to the plant. It is simply the transferal of pollution, and usage of a finite energy source.

Now, if the power was generated by clean nuclear power stations, that would be a different story.

Or, if the power was produced by wind, solar or geothermal energy plants, the story would be different.

But it is not. And no amount of advertising the clean nature of green cars will ever change that fact.

So, why not create clean energy…green energy such as solar, wind and geothermal?

The answer is simple. The technology has not advanced sufficiently for these power sources to be:-

1. Reliable
2.      2. Of sufficient quantity to meet current needs
3.      3. Competitively priced

And that is why government should not be wasting taxpayer money is training people for green jobs.

The industry does not have enough jobs to support them. Until those three things come into line, the industry will not ever be able to support green trained employees in the numbers Kermit wants to see.

The industry remains in its development stage. It is immature. It does not even know yet whether the technology advances in the future will lead to long term viability.

Even the players in this industry know it is a crap shoot….so why does the government play craps with your money?

Because it meets Kermits ideological pursuits.

That is the ONLY reason.

As I said…it aint easy being green….

…..devereaux